Evaluation of Shift Work on Bacterial Contamination of Cellular Phone of Health Care Staff at Adult Trauma Intensive Care Unit
Archives of Critical Care Medicine,
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016),
28 October 2023
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to explore the effect of a shift work at adult trauma intensive care units on microbial con[1]tamination of cellular phones. Prevalence and type of microorganisms on intensive care unit (ICU) staffmobile phones is considered as a major route for transmission of infection.
Methods: As a cross sectional study, cultures of mobile phone of 80 staff working at six adult trauma ICUs (54 beds) of a tertiary uni[1]versity affiliated hospital in Shiraz (Iran), were obtained, upon start and at the end of a shift. Samples were sent to the microbiologic laboratory of the hospital and cultured on specified media.
Results: From 80 cell phones, 74 (92.5%) were contaminated upon entrance to ICU. Microorganisms included Staphylococcus co[1]agulase negative 48 (60%), Bacillus 16 (20%), Acinetobacter 3 (3.75%) and others (Enterobacter, non hemolytic Streptococcus, E. coli and Serratia) with prevalence of 7 (8.75%). In comparison, exit cultures were positive for 49 (62.6%) of the cell phones that compromised of 34 (43.8%) coagulase negative Staphylococcus, 8 (10%) Bacillus, 2 (2.5%) Acinetobacter, and 5 (5.3%) contaminations with other microor[1]ganisms. Results showed a significant reduction in positive cultures at exit time from ICU. No correlation could be found between age, marital status, work experience in either hospital or ICU and changes in contamination of mobile phones. There was only a relationship between shift time and microbial colonization, which was more prevalent in night shifts followed by afternoon and morning shifts. Acinetobacter contamination of mobile phones of healthcare workers was more prevalent upon entrance to ICU than at exit time.
Conclusions: High prevalence of cellular phone contamination with potential microorganisms is a major concern in adult trauma ICUs. Contamination of this equipment is more prevalent upon start of shift work, so a reverse transmission of bacteria may take place. Prevalence of Acinetobacter on entrance cultures necessitates special consideration. Infection control strategies to reduce cell phone colonization of trauma ICU staff, should be applied.
- Acinetobacter Cellular Phone
- Shift Work
- Contamination
How to Cite
References
Singh S, Acharya S, Bhat M, Rao SK, Pentapati KC. Mobile phone hygiene: potential risks posed by use in the clinics of an Indian dental
school. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(10):1153–8. [PubMed: 20930247].
EL Kholy MT, Ewees IE. Mobile phones contamination with nosocomial pathogens in intensive care units. Med J Cairo Univ. 2010;78(2):1–5.
Khivsara A, Sushma TV, Dhanashree B. Typing of staphylococcus aureous from mobile phones and clinical samples. Curr Sci. 2006;90:910–
Brady RR, Wasson A, Stirling I, McAllister C, Damani NN. Is your
phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on healthcare workers’ mobile phones. J Hosp
Infect. 2006;62(1):123–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.005. [PubMed:
.
Patil PV, Pawar SA. Nosocomial hazards of doctord mobile phones. J
Theoret Exper Biol. 2012;8:115–21.
Shahaby AF, Awad NS, El Taras AE, Bahobial AS. Mobile phone as potential reservoirs of bacterial pathogens. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:15896–
Soto RG, Chu LF, Goldman JM, Rampil IJ, Ruskin KJ. Communication in critical care environments: mobile telephones
improve patient care. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(2):535–41. doi:
1213/01.ane.0000194506.79408.79. [PubMed: 16428557].
Visvanathan A, Gibb AP, Brady RR. Increasing clinical presence of
mobile communication technology: avoiding the pitfalls. Telemed
J E Health. 2011;17(8):656–61. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0018. [PubMed:
.
Giamberardino HI, Cesario EP, Carmes ER, Mulinari RA. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in trauma patients. Braz J Infect Dis.
;11(2):285–9. [PubMed: 17625779].
Wallace WC, Cinat M, Gornick WB, Lekawa ME, Wilson SE. Nosocomial
infections in the surgical intensive care unit: a difference between
trauma and surgical patients. Am Surg. 1999;65(10):987–90. [PubMed:
.
Zakai S, Mashat A, Abumohssin A, Samarkandi A, Almaghrabi A, Barradah H. Bacterial contamination of cell phones of medical students
at king abdulaziz university jeddeh Saudi Arabia. J Microscopy Ultrastructure. 2016;4:143–6.
Heyba M, Ismaiel M, Alotaibi A, Mahmoud M, Baqer H, Safar A, et al. Microbiological contamination of mobile phones of clinicians in intensive care units and neonatal care units in public hospitals in Kuwait.
BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:434. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1172-9. [PubMed:
.
Selim HS, Abaza AF. Microbial contamination of mobile phones in
a health care setting in Alexandria, Egypt. GMS Hyg Infect Control.
;10:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000246. [PubMed: 25699226].
Ulger F, Dilek A, Esen S, Sunbul M. Are healthcare workers mobile
phones a potential source of nosocomial infections review of the
litreture. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9(10):1046–53.
Shakir IA, Patel NH, Chamberland RR, Kaar SG. Investigation of
cell phones as a potential source of bacterial contamination in
the operating room. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(3):225–31. doi:
2106/JBJS.N.00523. [PubMed: 25653323].
Ustun C, Cihangiroglu M. Health care workers’ mobile phones: a
potential cause of microbial cross-contamination between hospitals and community. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(9):538–42. doi:
1080/15459624.2012.697419. [PubMed: 22793671].
Akinyemi KO, Atapu AD, Adetona OO, Coker AO. The potential role of
mobile phones in the spread of bacterial infections. J Infect Dev Ctries.
;3(8):628–32. [PubMed: 19801807].
Badr H, Badr R, Nabil A. Mobile phones and nosocomial infections.Int
infect control. 2012 ;8(2).
Nwankwo EO, Ekwunife N, Mofolorunsho KC. Nosocomial pathogens
associated with the mobile phones of healthcare workers in a
hospital in Anyigba, Kogi state, Nigeria. J Epidemiol Glob Health.
;4(2):135–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2013.11.002. [PubMed: 24857181].
Karabay O, Kocoglu E, Tahtaci M. The role of mobile phones in the
spread of bacteria associated with nosocomial infections. J Infect Developing Countries. 2007;1(1):72–3.
Beckstrom AC, Cleman PE, Cassis-Ghavami FL, Kamitsuka MD. Surveillance study of bacterial contamination of the parent’s cell phone
in the NICU and the effectiveness of an anti-microbial gel in reducing transmission to the hands. J Perinatol. 2013;33(12):960–3. doi:
1038/jp.2013.108. [PubMed: 24008502].
Chawla K, Mukhopadhayay C, Gurung B, Bhate P, Bairy I. Bacterial cell
phones do cell phones carry potential pathogens.online. J Health Allied Sci. 2009;8(1):8.
Haghbin S, Pourabbas B, Serati S, Alborzi . Bacterial contamination
of mobile phones and pens in pediatric and neonatal intensive care
units. Inter J Current Microbiol Applied Sci. 2015;4(2):75–81.
Mohammadi M, Karbasizadeh V. Bacterial contamination of healthcare worker’smobile phones and efficacy of surface decolonization
techniques. Afr J Microbial Res. 2011;5(30):5415–8.
Bhat SS, Hegde SK, Salian S. Potential of mobile phones to serve as a
reservoir in spread of nosocomial pathogens. Online J Health Allied Sci.
;10(2):14.
Datta P, Rani H, Chander J, Gupta V. Bacterial contamination of
mobile phones of health care workers. Indian J Med Microbiol.
;27(3):279–81. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.53222. [PubMed: 19584520].
Goldblatt JG, Krief I, Klonsky T, Haller D, Milloul V, Sixsmith DM,
et al. Use of cellular telephones and transmission of pathogens by
medical staff in New York and Israel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.
;28(4):500–3. doi: 10.1086/513446. [PubMed: 17385162].
Saxena S, Singh T, Agarwal H, Mehta G, Dutta R. Bacterial colonization
of rings and cell phones carried by health-care providers: are these
mobile bacterial zoos in the hospital?. Trop Doct. 2011;41(2):116–8. doi:
1258/td.2010.100186. [PubMed: 21273217].
Jeske HC, Tiefenthaler W, Hohlrieder M, Hinterberger G, Benzer A.
Bacterial contamination of anaesthetists’ hands by personal mobile phone and fixed phone use in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):904–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05172.x. [PubMed:
- Abstract Viewed: 13 times
- PDF Downloaded: 0 times